Category: Material Misrepresentation – Procurement Of Insurance Policy

Proof of military status not enough on a material misrepresentation DJ

Healthy Way Acupuncture, P.C. v USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51342(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) “While defendant submitted evidence showing that plaintiff’s assignor misrepresented his military status in the underlying insurance policy application, defendant is precluded from asserting that defense as a result of its untimely denial of the claim (see Westchester Med. […]

Read Full Article

Material Misrepresentation defense

Alignment Chiropractic, P.C. v Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 50994(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the policy had it known the facts misrepresented. To establish materiality as a matter of law, the insurer must present documentation concerning its underwriting practices, […]

Read Full Article

Material Misrepresentation Defense unsuccessful

Maxford, Inc. v Erie Ins. Co. of N.Y., 2018 NY Slip Op 51057(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Defendant cross-moved on the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had fraudulently procured the insurance policy in question by making a material misrepresentation on her policy application as to her place of residence and the principal location for the garaging of […]

Read Full Article

Material Misrepresentations – Must follow the Ins Law 3105 rule

Liliya Veksler, LCSW, P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50741(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018). “In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had procured […]

Read Full Article

Fraudulent procurement defense not substantiated

Quality Med. Care, PC v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50999(U)(Civ. Ct. Bronx Co. 2017) I read this and I think the Court missed the issue, yet arrived at the result it should have.  First issue: a material misrepresentation defense (Ins Law 3105) does not require an intentional misrepresentation.  That said, second issue: […]

Read Full Article

Georgia Law and New York law on material misrepresentations

JCC Med., P.C. v Infinity Group, 2016 NY Slip Op 26439 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) It is uncontroverted that defendant had issued a Georgia automobile insurance policy to the brother of plaintiff’s assignor, “effective from August 28, 2010 through August 28, 2011,” who had made various representations to defendant in his insurance application, including […]

Read Full Article

Material misrepresentation again

Joseph v Interboro Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 08050 (2d Dept. 2016) (1) “Based on the information provided by McKayle, Karis completed an application for insurance, which said that the premises would be occupied by the plaintiffs as their primary residence. The plaintiffs signed the application, and thereafter, on the date of closing, a homeowners’ […]

Read Full Article

Fraudulent procurement has now been changed into a material misrepresentation defense

Renelique v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51615(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) It appears that Oleg Rybak has gotten his point across that the “fraudulent procurement” defense is really a material misrepresentation defense in disguise.  This defense has to fit within the parameters of Ins Law 3105 and be supported with […]

Read Full Article

The Court comments on a copy and paste job

Infinity Ins. Co. v Nazaire, 2016 NY Slip Op 31454(U)(Sup. Ct. Kings Co. 2016) This is a PA rescission case based upon a garaging issue.  The Court caught on to something interesting.  First, the EUO of the Defendant was not annexed to the moving papers.  Second, the Court found the investigator affidavit to be hearsay. Third, […]

Read Full Article

Fraudulent procurement defense looks more like a 3105 defense

Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51000(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Moreover, defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that the misrepresentation by plaintiff’s assignor as to his place of residence was material (see Interboro Ins. Co. v Fatmir, 89 AD3d 993 [2011]). For the foregoing reasons, the branches […]

Read Full Article