WeSueThem in federal, state, and local courts, protecting YOU every step of the way.

LAW | CONSUMER RIGHTS | PRODUCT LIABILITY | EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS | PERSONAL INJURY

WeSueThem Blog

4-8 MINUTE READ

I was asked again about the defamation that appears sporadically against me on the internet. I took down my last post because I thought by both OREN ZIV and his attorney being sued for defaming me, it would stop. Well, I was being rational and that was a mistake. I would note that I rid […]
Unique Physical Therapy, PT, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y., 2021 NY Slip Op 50323(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2021) “To the extent that defendant cites Premier Surgical Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (65 Misc 3d 140[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 51704[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019]) to […]
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v A B Med. Servs., PLLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 07280 (1st Dept. 2020) “As an initial issue, 11 NYCRR 65-3.11 (a) limits no-fault medical billing to employees of the provider that submits claims for no-fault benefits. It is submitted that Supreme Court properly granted judgment in favor of plaintiffs, because […]
American Tr. Ins. Co. v Health Plus Surgery Ctr., LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 01499 (1st Dept. 2021) “Plaintiff is not entitled to de novo adjudication of the master arbitrator’s award in favor of defendant CitiMed Services, PA, because the award is less than $5,000 (Insurance Law § 5106[c]). The medical services provided to plaintiff’s […]
Pavlova v Nationwide Ins., 2021 NY Slip Op 50213(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2021) “To establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing a complaint on the ground that a plaintiff’s assignor failed to appear for an EUO, an insurer must demonstrate, as a matter of law, that it twice duly demanded an EUO from […]
JPF Med. Servs., P.C. v Nationwide Ins., 2020 NY Slip Op 51122(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) ” Here, defendant failed to demonstrate, as a matter of law, that it had made any payments under the policy because, as plaintiff argues, defendant’s claim specialist did not lay a sufficient foundation for the payment log, upon which defendant […]
Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v Nationwide Ins., 2020 NY Slip Op 51133(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. Contrary to the Civil Court’s determination, “appearance at an [EUO] is required whether the insurance company demands the [EUO] before the claim form is submitted or after the […]
Uy v Hussein, 2020 NY Slip Op 05080 (2d Dept. 2020) “In any event, even considering Hussein’s affidavit, as well as an affidavit submitted in reply by Uber representative Chad Dobbs, which contained essentially the same averments as Hussein’s affidavit, Uber failed to meet its burden. An action may be considered to be within the […]
Alignment Chiropractic, P.C. v Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 50994(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the policy had it known the facts misrepresented. To establish materiality as a matter of law, the insurer must present documentation concerning its underwriting practices, […]
Gargano v Langman, 2020 NY Slip Op 04923 (2d Dept. 2020) “An order denying a motion to compel a witness to answer questions propounded at an examination before trial is akin to a ruling made in the course of the examination itself and is not appealable as of right, even where it was made upon […]
Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 02687 (3d Dept. 2020) “Turning to the issue of damages, we reject Yugo’s contention that Supreme Court erred in not requiring expert testimony to prove plaintiffs’ damages. Generally speaking, “expert testimony is appropriate when it serves to clarify an issue that is beyond the […]
Matter of Vega (Postmates Inc.–Commissioner of Labor), 2020 NY Slip Op 02094 (2020) Your Uber driver is an employee. Watershed moment I think. “Here, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination that Postmates exercised control over its couriers sufficient to render them employees rather than independent contractors operating their own […]
Ross v Geico Indem. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 04242 (3d Dept. 2019) ” In October 2014, defendant denied plaintiff any additional no-fault insurance lost wage benefits after receiving notification from Walmart that plaintiff was terminated from employment due to her lack of compliance with Walmart’s leave of absence guidelines. Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action […]
Moshe v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 29138 (Dis. Ct. Nassau Co. 2019) Introductory thoughts I love this case. It makes little sense for many reasons. But what is perplexing is how much of the income of Moshe is active? He missed a day of work – what business opportunities were missed? What […]
Noel v Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 2019 NY Slip Op 02348 (2d Dept. 2019) (1) ” The Supreme Court denied those branches of the defendant’s motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7), and in effect denied those branches of the defendant’s motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3) and CPLR 3212, on […]
Majestic Acupuncture, P.C. v Interboro Mut. Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51785(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “The decision to grant severance (see CPLR 603) is an exercise of judicial discretion which, in the absence of a party’s showing of prejudice to a substantial right, should not be disturbed on appeal (see King’s Med. Supply, Inc. v […]
Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v Hartford Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51591(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, a lack of coverage defense may be raised without regard to any issue as to the propriety or timeliness of an insurer’s denial of claim form (see Zappone v Home Ins. Co., 55 NY2d […]
Moshe v Country-Wide Ins. Co.. 2018 NY Slip Op 28220 (Dis. Ct. Nassau Co. 2018) (1) “Plaintiffs bring this plenary action to recover the sum of $10,906.14, said sum being the balance of monies claimed due as loss of earning for Moshe’s appearance at a November 10, 2015 examination under oath (EUO or deposition) taken in […]
Maxford, Inc. v Erie Ins. Co. of N.Y., 2018 NY Slip Op 51057(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Defendant cross-moved on the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had fraudulently procured the insurance policy in question by making a material misrepresentation on her policy application as to her place of residence and the principal location for the garaging of […]
Liliya Veksler, LCSW, P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50741(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018). “In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had procured […]
Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 03093 (2018) 4-3 holding.   For self insured entities, the statute of limitations is 3 years. Judge Stein was blunt in saying: “I concur in the majority’s analysis and conclusion. However, I write separately to point out that, on this appeal, we do not […]
Martinez v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02028 (1st Dept. 2008) “Plaintiff failed to establish her past lost earnings with reasonable certainty since her testimony was unsubstantiated by tax returns, W-2 forms, or other documentation (Orellano v 29 E. 37th St. Realty Corp., 4 AD3d 247 [1st Dept 2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 702 [2004]; cf. Kane v […]
Chiropractic Testing Servs. of N.Y., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 28052 (Civ. Ct. Richmond Co. 2018) “This case is distinguishable from Global Liberty, however, because Assignor did not own his vehicle. Here, American United Transportation (hereinafter, “the cab company”) owned the vehicle and was named as the insured on the automobile insurance […]
Gomez v Cabatic, 2018 NY Slip Op 00278 (2d Dept. 2018) “On consideration of the above authority, we now hold that where, as here, a plaintiff recovers compensatory damages for a medical professional’s malpractice, a plaintiff may also recover punitive damages for that medical professional’s act of altering or destroying medical records in an effort […]
Devonshire Surgical Facility, L.L.C. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52297(U)(2d Dept. 2010) “Therefore, resolution of the factual question presented on this record “is best suited for determination by the [Workers’ Compensation] Board, given its expertise in the area” (Arvatz, 171 AD2d at 269), and the parties’ respective summary judgment motions should have […]
Matter of Progressive Advanced Ins. Co. (Widdecombe), 2018 NY Slip Op 00061 (3d Dept. 2018) (1) “Initially, it is undisputed, as Supreme Court correctly determined, that Germain is an uninsured motorist as none of his automobile policies, including a prior policy with Hartford, was in effect on the date of this incident. Thus, any exclusion in […]
Freligh v Government Employees Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 08714 (2017) “Triable issues of fact exist as to plaintiff’s claim for lost wages. ” This was the case where the Appellate Division, Third Department went to great pains to show that the Plaintiff’s lost wage claims were the textbook definition of speculative.  The dissent argued […]
Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v Hartford Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51470(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2017) This first party, no-fault action is not susceptible to summary disposition. The evidentiary proof submitted by defendant-insurer in support of its motion for summary judgment, while sufficient to demonstrate that defendant had a “founded belief” that the assignor’s injuries […]
Contact Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Girtha Butler v N. Y. City Tr. Auth., 2017 NY Slip Op 88572 (2017) Apparently, an entity that has NO stake in this battle, American Transit Ins. Co., felt the need to file an Amicus on this issue.  Should make for some light an highly relevant reading. Assuming the Court […]
AEE Med. Diagnostic, P.C. v Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., 2017 NY Slip Op 51209(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2017) “Defendant’s submissions in support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing this first-party, no-fault action, including the statement of plaintiff’s assignor, raised triable issues as to whether the assignor had been acting in the course of […]
Compas Med., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51192(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Contrary to plaintiff’s argument on appeal, defendant proffered sufficient evidence to support its contention that there was an issue as to whether plaintiff’s assignor had been acting as an employee at the time of the accident, and that, therefore, […]
Quality Med. Care, PC v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50999(U)(Civ. Ct. Bronx Co. 2017) I read this and I think the Court missed the issue, yet arrived at the result it should have.  First issue: a material misrepresentation defense (Ins Law 3105) does not require an intentional misrepresentation.  That said, second issue: […]
Freligh v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 05911 (3d Dept. 2017) Admittedly, I like the issue of lost wages.  I am convinced few practitioners understand all the nuances involved – I will not say more.  It is clearly an undeveloped area of no-fault law and seemingly all over the place.  Perhaps that is […]
Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v Trombley, 2017 NY Slip Op 03927 (2d Dept. 2017) “Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the admissibility of the records relied upon by its account officer under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see CPLR 4518[a]), and thus, failed to establish a default in […]
High Definition MRI, P.C. v Mapfre Ins. Co. of N.Y., 2017 NY Slip Op 01800 (1st Dept. 2017) “The court properly severed the breach of contract cause of action, since the 198 unrelated no-fault claims asserted therein raise no common issues of fact or law (see CPLR 603; Radiology Resource Network, P.C., v Fireman’s Fund Ins. […]
Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50105(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “A motion for leave to renew “shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]) and must “contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such […]
JCC Med., P.C. v Infinity Group, 2016 NY Slip Op 26439 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) It is uncontroverted that defendant had issued a Georgia automobile insurance policy to the brother of plaintiff’s assignor, “effective from August 28, 2010 through August 28, 2011,” who had made various representations to defendant in his insurance application, including […]
Joseph v Interboro Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 08050 (2d Dept. 2016) (1) “Based on the information provided by McKayle, Karis completed an application for insurance, which said that the premises would be occupied by the plaintiffs as their primary residence. The plaintiffs signed the application, and thereafter, on the date of closing, a homeowners’ […]
Renelique v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51615(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) It appears that Oleg Rybak has gotten his point across that the “fraudulent procurement” defense is really a material misrepresentation defense in disguise.  This defense has to fit within the parameters of Ins Law 3105 and be supported with […]
Infinity Ins. Co. v Nazaire, 2016 NY Slip Op 31454(U)(Sup. Ct. Kings Co. 2016) This is a PA rescission case based upon a garaging issue.  The Court caught on to something interesting.  First, the EUO of the Defendant was not annexed to the moving papers.  Second, the Court found the investigator affidavit to be hearsay. Third, […]
Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51000(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Moreover, defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that the misrepresentation by plaintiff’s assignor as to his place of residence was material (see Interboro Ins. Co. v Fatmir, 89 AD3d 993 [2011]). For the foregoing reasons, the branches […]
ELRAC LLC v Duque, 2016 NY Slip Op 26169 (App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) This is not a no-fault issue but something that has always worried me in my own life.  Assume like many people you rent a car.  Furthermore, assume you let someone drive it who is not on the rental contract.  That someone else […]
Contact Chiropractic, P.C., as assignee of Butler v New York City Transit Authority, 2016 NY Slip Op 73043(U)(2d Dept. 2016) SOL on self-insured’s going up to the Court of Appeals. “ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the following question is certified to the Court of Appeals: Was the decision and order of this Court dated […]
Beal-Medea Prods., Inc. v Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50594(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Plaintiff’s motion should have been granted. Defendant’s CPLR 4401 motion for judgment as a matter of law was made before the close of plaintiff’s case, and was therefore premature (see Kamanou v Bert, 94 AD3d 704 [2012]). Furthermore, the […]
Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50367(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, a lack of coverage defense may be raised without regard to any issue as to the propriety or timeliness of an insurer’s denial of claim form (see Zappone v Home Ins. Co., 55 NY2d 131, […]
Privacy Policy

This privacy policy applies to information collected online from users of this website. In this policy, you can learn what kind of information we collect, when and how we might use that information, how we protect the information, and the choices you have with respect to your personal information.

What personal information is collected through this website and how is it used?

We collect information about our users in three ways: directly from the user, from our Web server logs and through cookies. We use the information primarily to provide you with a personalized Internet experience that delivers the information, resources, and services that are most relevant and helpful to you. We don’t share any of the information you provide with others, unless we say so in this Privacy Policy, or when we believe in good faith that the law requires it. 

User-supplied information: If you fill out the “contact” form on this website, we will ask you to provide some personal information (such as e-mail address, name, phone number and state). We only require that you provide an e-mail address on the contact form. Further, if chat is available through this site, you may be asked to provide information if you participate in an online chat. Please do not submit any confidential, proprietary or sensitive personally identifiable information (e.g. Social Security Number; date of birth; drivers license number; or credit card, bank account or other financial information) (collectively, “Sensitive Information”). If you submit any Sensitive Information, you do so at your own risk and we will not be liable to you or responsible for consequences of your submission. Information that you provide to us through the contact form or an online chat will be used so that we may respond to your inquiry. We may also use information you provide to us to communicate with you in the future. If you do not wish to receive such communications, you may opt out (unsubscribe) as described below. 

Web server logs: When you visit our website, we may track information about your visit and store that information in web server logs, which are records of the activities on our sites. The servers automatically capture and save the information electronically. Examples of the information we may collect include:

  • your unique Internet protocol address;
  • the name of your unique Internet service provider;
  • the town/city, county/state and country from which you access our website;
  • the kind of browser or computer you use;
  • the number of links you click within the site;
  • the date and time of your visit;
  • the web page from which you arrived to our site;
  • the pages you viewed on the site; and
  • certain searches/queries that you conducted via our website(s).

The information we collect in web server logs helps us administer the site, analyze its usage, protect the website and its content from inappropriate use and improve the user’s experience. 

Cookies: In order to offer and provide a customized and personal service, our websites and applications may use cookies and similar technologies to store and help track information about you. Cookies are simply small pieces of data that are sent to your browser from a Web server and stored on your computer’s hard drive. We use cookies to help remind us who you are and to help you navigate our sites during your visits. Cookies also can tell us where visitors go on a website and allow us to save preferences for you so you won’t have to re-enter them each time you visit. The use of cookies is relatively standard. Most Internet browsers are initially set up to accept cookies, but you can use your browser to either notify you when you receive a cookie or to disable cookies. If you wish to disable cookies from this site, you can do so using your browser. You should understand that some features of many sites may not function properly if you don’t accept cookies. For more information about using browsers to manage cookies, please see All About Cookies. You can also refuse to accept Flash cookies from this website using Adobe’s Flash management tools. You can opt out of Google’s use of cookies by visiting Google’s Ad Settings. By visiting this website, you consent to the use of cookies and similar technologies in accordance with this Privacy Statement. 

Third-party Services: We may use services hosted by third parties, including Adobe Site Catalyst, to assist in providing our services and to help us understand the use of our site by our visitors. These services may collect information sent by your browser as part of a web page request, including your IP address or cookies. If these third-party services collect information, they do so anonymously and in the aggregate to provide information helpful to us such as website trends, without identifying individual visitors. In addition, we may use services provided by third parties to display relevant content, products, services and advertising to you. These third parties may use cookies, web beacons and similar technologies to collect or receive information from this website and elsewhere on the internet. They may then use that information to provide measurement services so we can understand your interests and retarget advertisements based on your previous visits to this website. Please keep in mind that we do not share your personal information with any third-party advertiser, ad server or ad network. You may be able to opt-out of the collection and use of information for ad targeting by some third parties by visiting www.aboutads.info/choices. You can opt out of Google’s use of cookies by visiting Google’s Ad Settings. You can visit this page to opt out of AdRoll’s and their partners’ targeted advertising. Please see “Cookies” in the section above for more information on how you can control the use of cookies on your computer. 

California Do Not Track: Our web services do not alter, change, or respond upon receiving Do Not Track (DNT) requests or signals in browsers. As described in more detail above, we track user activity using web server logs, cookies and similar technologies. Information collected in web server logs helps us analyze website usage and improve the user’s experience. Cookies allow us to offer you a customized experience and present relevant advertising to you.

How is personal information protected?

We take certain appropriate security measures to help protect your personal information from accidental loss and from unauthorized access, use or disclosure. However, we cannot guarantee that unauthorized persons will always be unable to defeat our security measures.

Who has access to the information?

We will not sell, rent, or lease mailing lists or other user data to others, and we will not make your personal information available to any unaffiliated parties, except as follows:

  • to agents, website vendors and/or contractors who may use it on our behalf or in connection with their relationship with us;
  • if we are unable to assist with your matter, but know an unaffiliated attorney or firm that may be able to help you, we may refer you and share information you provided us with that party; and
  • as required by law, in a matter of public safety or policy, as needed in connection with the transfer of our business assets (for example, if we are acquired by another firm or if we are liquidated during bankruptcy proceedings), or if we believe in good faith that sharing the data is necessary to protect our rights or property.

How can I correct, amend or delete my personal information and/or opt out of future communications?

You may opt out of any future contacts from us at any time. Contact us via the phone number, contact form or mailing address on our website at any time to:

  • see what data we have about you, if any;
  • change/correct any data we have about you;
  • ask us to delete any data we have about you; and/or
  • opt out of future communications from us.

If you have any additional questions or concerns about this privacy policy, please contact us via the phone number, contact form or mailing address listed on this website. If our information practices change in a significant way, we will post the policy changes here.

Contact Us

The Muhlstock Law Firm

WeSueThem.com

Attention: Compliance Department

35 Pinelawn Road

Suite 105E

Melville, NY 11747